Royal decree. All oatmilk will henceforth be replaced with mushy peas
Group Banter Race to a million
- Thread starter Deleted member 1394328
- Start date
Shall I manipulate ChatGPT to come up with incontrovertible proof that mushy peas are literal poison?
Taking the pea outta peace there
Always taking the peas
That’s a British expression right?
That’s a British expression right?
If you swap blood for peas, you die. So. That's proof
Did chatgpt confirm that?
I don’t want to get into the merits of oatmilk…honestly, it curdles with pineapple juice so I’ll reach for coconut milk first; however, this convo raises good awareness regarding use of AI and I can’t be quiet.
You have to use the right AI for the right job, or you’re misusing the tool. General use of gpt5 for scientific research isn’t indexed on actual scientific indexes and can fabricate citations even if you tell it not to. Requires a lot of oversight if you’re using it for a real decision. It’s honestly a bad idea.
If you want to scour the globe for is my oatmilk good or bad, then use Consensus or Elicit or Scite or any other agent trained on a locked in index of scientific papers. Tell it to only use peer reviewed papers. Have it argue both sides of the fence. You’ll be surprised that both sides are scientifically convincing on the surface until you dig. Then make your own conclusion based on the scientific vigour of the papers it provided. This is not a slam to anyone here. Drink what you want whenever you want, keep using whatever AI tool you want, or don’t ever touch them. I just think it’s dangerous to use AI as proof…at least at this point in time.
I’m not here to get in a massive debate with anyone (*cough*…stan…love ya buddy) or high-jack the fun of thread. I’m done talking about serious shit. Hit my dm if you want to learn. I’m just here looking for pineapples, so what would I fucking know…I only work in the field and create AI models and adapt them. Where’s my fucking pineapple?
You have to use the right AI for the right job, or you’re misusing the tool. General use of gpt5 for scientific research isn’t indexed on actual scientific indexes and can fabricate citations even if you tell it not to. Requires a lot of oversight if you’re using it for a real decision. It’s honestly a bad idea.
If you want to scour the globe for is my oatmilk good or bad, then use Consensus or Elicit or Scite or any other agent trained on a locked in index of scientific papers. Tell it to only use peer reviewed papers. Have it argue both sides of the fence. You’ll be surprised that both sides are scientifically convincing on the surface until you dig. Then make your own conclusion based on the scientific vigour of the papers it provided. This is not a slam to anyone here. Drink what you want whenever you want, keep using whatever AI tool you want, or don’t ever touch them. I just think it’s dangerous to use AI as proof…at least at this point in time.
I’m not here to get in a massive debate with anyone (*cough*…stan…love ya buddy) or high-jack the fun of thread. I’m done talking about serious shit. Hit my dm if you want to learn. I’m just here looking for pineapples, so what would I fucking know…I only work in the field and create AI models and adapt them. Where’s my fucking pineapple?
I'd like some pineapple juice
Ordered chicken curry all is good
Actually you can have it all, I don’t like pineapple
Better find pants before I answer the door
Answering the door with no pants is a power move though
I’d need confirmation of who was gonna be on the other side of the door
I could get to Ireland in like 4 hours or something
Will you bring curry?I could get to Ireland in like 4 hours or something
