why would hamas attack israel? in the face of 75 years of oppression and injustice from israel while the world turns a blind eye, you wouldn't attack them yourself?
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/features/2023/10/11/analysis-why-did-hamas-attack-now-and-what-is-next. Ive posted supporting evidence in my second post, ive been reiterating the talking points of that post so i haven't reposted the evidence. btw why are you accusing me for not stating evidence when you havent shown any either. Ive spent hours on this one thread alone and its obviously not going to change your mind no matter what i say and how i prove it so at the end of the day can we just agree that Palestinians deserve rights like any other human being and that we should all advocate for a permanent ceasefire to put a stop to this genocide.
I have been stating evidence, but you probably missed it since it was not in a simplistic fashion such bullet points so I will do that here.
On threads such as these; especially in the politics forum where people easily post misinformation, I always come in to fact check them. Does not matter what side of the argument, both sides have a tendency to post misinformation to support their cause. It isn't their fault, it is the fault that misinformation is so easily found online.
You first mention "You can not trust the mainstream media they have an obvious agenda when it comes to geopolitics coverage they lose all credibility due to their white supremacist semantics". Then you go on to post a link to Al Jazeera which has been known for controversial posts having anti semitism and pro Palestine viewpoints
In May 2019, AJ+ produced a video
denying and minimizing the Holocaust. Al Jazeera said it had "swiftly deleted" the video, stating that it had "violated the editorial standards of the network". The video stated that "[the] number [of Jews murdered in the Holocaust] had been exaggerated and 'adopted by the Zionist movement', and that Israel is the 'biggest winner' from the genocide." (Reference -
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-48335169)
Now you can say what you want about bias but a news outlet of any credibility would not allow something like that to be run.
During the
Second Intifada,
Palestinians killed by Israelis were referred to as "martyrs"; Israelis killed by Palestinians were not(reference-
https://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/18/magazine/what-the-muslim-world-is-watching.html)
Officials of
Palestinian El Comandante Mahmoud Abbas'
Fatah party has accused Al-Jazeera of bias toward Hamas (with which it is at political loggerheads), and
Fatah official
Mohammed Dahlan sued the broadcaster
(Reference(s)-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7292676.stm
https://www.haaretz.com/2008-03-12/...o-terror/0000017f-f871-d2d5-a9ff-f8fd69bb0000
https://www.boston.com/news/world/m...03/13/israel_imposes_sanctions_on_al_jazeera/)
In 2013,
UN researcher Nicola Perugini was accused by
UN Watch of fabricating a
United Nations Human Rights Council session in his Al Jazeera article about the latest
UNHRC report on Israeli settlements
(Reference-
https://unwatch.org/al-jazeera-reports-on-un-session-that-never-happened/)
During the
2023 Israel-Hamas war, Al Jazeera was conducting an interview with a wounded Gazan resident, who blamed Hamas hiding amongst civilians for his wounds; Al Jazeera promptly ended the interview
(Reference-
https://m.jpost.com/middle-east/article-773289)
Al Jazeera has also been accused of pushing Hamas propaganda, repeatedly broadcasting statements by Hamas' military and political leaders calling for a broader uprising and aligning themselves closely with Hamas' preferred language for the conflict
(Reference-
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-hamas-propaganda-war)
Since Al Jazeera's founding in 1996, its Islamist skew grew stronger and damaged Qatar’s political relations with its neighboring states of Saudi Arabia and Egypt
(Reference-
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1464884918812221)
According to
Hugh Miles writing for the BBC, "Al-Jazeera network remains the standard bearer for the Islamist position." (Reference-
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25551518)
Shireen Abu Akleh was associated with Al Jazeera since 2000, the beginning of
second Palestinian Intifada. In May 2022, she was in
West Bank to cover the Israeli raids in
Jenin. On 11 May, Abu Akleh was shot in the head during crossfire between Israeli forces and Palestinian militants. The Israeli military has admitted that there is a high probability of taking the shot "by mistake. She was taken to the hospital in a critical condition and was shortly pronounced dead. Al Jazeera claimed that it was a deliberate act of targeting and killing their journalist by the Israeli forces.
Israeli Defence Forces said the firing was from two sides, Israeli forces and Palestinian suspects of “terrorist activities”. They also said that it was being investigated if Abu Akleh was possibly hit by Palestinian gunfire. However, Al Jazeera disagreed saying there was no shooting by Palestinian gunmen
(Reference(s)-
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62793579
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/11/middleeast/al-jazeera-journalist-killed-intl-hnk?cid=ios_app(medium credibility)
All of these was just from the criticism of Al Jazeera alone. Yet you have just posted news sources from Al Jazeera or you have mentioned how anything pro Israel is white supremacist. For example you stated "Zionism does not equal Judaism. Zionism is a white supremacist movement". The anti defamation league has claimed that to be false. You most likely have gotten that misinformation that Alt Right leader Richard Spencer called himself a white Zionist. (Reference-
https://www.adl.org/resources/media-watch/zionism-nothing-white-supremacy)
Everything I post is high credibility, the only one that wasn't was from Al Jazeera because you might be complaining otherwise. This is also why I am so vehemently against using Wikipedia. The sources on Wikipedia can be better but not always. When I was fact checking the sources on Al Jazeera critiscm and controversy, the first source that was highly credible was number 16. There are also criticisms and controversial evidence of Al Jazeera from non western countries if you would like me to post those as well