POTUS POTUS Impeachment
- Thread starter Ericisthename
- Start date
What a waste of time, and an embarrassment for the American Congress.
Next thread:
That's what Lidnsey Grahm said . Still repeating right wing propaganda I see. No original thoughts of your own. Bah, baaa, baaa , baaaa that's a good little sheep. Or do you actually have reasons to believe it's a waste of time ? And an embarrassment for the American Congress? If so what are they ? Explain your opinion if you can .
So the aid to Ukraine was officially put on hold the day of the second call with Zelensky, and it was released after Tr.ump was told about the whistle blower complaint. But there's nothing wrong there right @Ericisthename ? And now with the hearings moving to the Judiciary Committee I bet even more curruption is going to be exposed.
In 2017 a Senate Intelligence Committee with Richard Burr as chairman looked into whether Ukraine attempted to interfere in the 2016 election day found nothing worth pursuing. Which is also what our own intelligence agencies found in the case of Ukraine. No report has ever been produced by any of our intelligence agencies blaming anyone but Russia for interfering in our election with the goal of helping Tr.ump win the election. I usually don't quote Democratic polititions but it was Russia who first accused Ukraine and now this new report from House Republicans pushes that narrative that has no evidence to support it . So yes Republicans in Congress have become Putins greatest foriegn asset at this point even surpassing Tr.ump in value to Russia.
The good thing about having constitutional law experts testify is they well study constitutional law . And mention things like the 3rd article of impeachment against Nixon was that he ignored Congressional subpoenas. Four to be exact. Rudeman had ignored more than four and as this expert pointed out he has ordered the Executive Branch to not comply. If ignoreing four subpoenas was considered obstruction of Congress in Nixons case surely ignoreing more than four in Tru.mps case would be grounds for impeachment right ? Bit I invite any Tr.ump supporters to tell me why that is an incorrect assumption. But I think they all are hiding at the moment.
@AmazonTS - I am an outsider. However, as I see it Democrats do not need Republicans to beat them. They do that to themselves.
First Kamala's camp fought, then Bidens, now its Bernie vs Warren. Pete is on his own trip. Yang is doing his stuff. So 5-6 camps are formed. Their policies differ a lot. The only thing they are united on is MrT. out of the losing 5 camps, most then feel indifferent to vote. Happened last time, fear that might happen again.
Whereas on the other side, if anything they say the same stuff.
First Kamala's camp fought, then Bidens, now its Bernie vs Warren. Pete is on his own trip. Yang is doing his stuff. So 5-6 camps are formed. Their policies differ a lot. The only thing they are united on is MrT. out of the losing 5 camps, most then feel indifferent to vote. Happened last time, fear that might happen again.
Whereas on the other side, if anything they say the same stuff.
You both are correct to an extent. But his hardcore supporters would have voted for him anyway. The Democrats do not need his hardcore base to not vote for him for them to win. He won in 2016 by a very slim margin. Who knows how people will vote in November but the mid terms and the last round of state elections went well for the Dems. What will determine 2020 is how many each side can turn out . That's it . He won by electoral college last time. If more Democrats had came out and not been complacent or withheld their vote because they didn't like Hillary he would have lost . I think he can win again but his path to victory is more narrow than before. As far as Democratic infighting that's always been part of the process for them . It doesn't matter as long as they fall in line and vote for the eventual nominee. And I think that this time they will. We all can see what happens when just a few don't show up . We get this shit show of a ' government' we have now. I'm a registered Democrat in a state that is solid blue but I still go out and vote . If others do the same in the blue wall states and just a few undecideds either vote blue or withhold their vote he will lose .
As a Brit living in Germany, I find myself in the unusual position of thanking the powers that be for Angela Merkel and Boris Johnson.
I could have been "Born in the U.S.A." (that would make a good song title, don't you think ?) and have to suffer through the daily trials and tribulations of having Donald T as my countries Leader.
Ya gotta take the win !!!
I could have been "Born in the U.S.A." (that would make a good song title, don't you think ?) and have to suffer through the daily trials and tribulations of having Donald T as my countries Leader.
Ya gotta take the win !!!
The title says "Rudeman vs. Iran: Now What?" but 4:27 in and all I see is an American badmouthing U.S.
The Beauty of a democracy is to ask and check on what we do. People speaking all are from the same nation. and understanding what is happening due to a history of the area is crucial to know what future we wish to walk towards.
Do point anything you think they said wrong about?
Do point anything you think they said wrong about?
Wrong approach with opening rhetoric. I only watched 4:27 of it.
Haha Boris is a dick but not as big a one as Tr.ump it's funny he's the more moderate choice if you could choose though, I'll give you that .
