Group Banter Race to a million

R.d5cff545accb0062298ea5e2d3769d5e
 
Stanthropical said:
You viewed the sentencing as a consequence of law breaking to be wild in the astronaut case. The person broke laws and wasted resources.
You then accused me of patronizing. Weird, but okay...
You then shifted the frame several times. No problem. I can follow you where you wanna go. Idgaf.
I then stated that in UK one might get jailed for only speaking out against govt, just using words or text, not even abusing resources.
You didn't believe it and demanded sources for that suggestion.
I provided resources.
Now you're stating that speaking out against govt action is illegal. Fine, if that's how it works in your country. But the matter of fact is that freedom of speech is being shat on. That shit is wild. That is it. That's the wild thing. Dafuq is "online speech crime"? Wild af.
Click to expand...
But I haven't shifted the frame at all. I stated an opinion. It went weird. I accused you of patronising because if you read what you wrote, that's 100% a patronising "question".

Also. I'm not saying that speaking out against govt action is illegal. I'm saying that the reasons that the people were arrested wasn't because of them speaking out against the government. Because it's not. They were arrested because of either hate speech, inciting violence or supporting a terrorist organisation (again, I don't agree that they are a terrorist org and it's being fought in the courts but currently they are being listed as one)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top