Group Banter Race to a million

Tash26 said:
That's fine. But again, I don't care about it's sources. I don't like reading the content that your gpt gives. I get it's the style of content you like but it's just unwarranted
Click to expand...
Tbh all the content you need to read is right here:








You can literally see that it's just sugar without protein buffer, oat sludge and questionable ingredients. If you understand how these ingredients are processed by your body, involving mechanics of multiple organ systems, you'll see that the substance is nutritionally garbage and there's no way to refute that.

The GPT only highlighted cultural ignorance / lack of education, corporate greed and deception as well as manufacturing process using language that's unfiltered. Lack of citations does not invalidate facts.

But I have updated the convo with citations (shared conversations can be continued privately, you can throw anything you want at it):

https://chatgpt.com/share/68ac8b58-931c-8001-aaed-1e660d641d61
 
But again. I feel like you're going round in circles. I don't care that it's not super healthy. It's also not super unhealthy. So I'm going to keep drinking it. And I'll drink worse stuff. And it probably won't kill me
 
Harthacnut said:
Wait do I need a new picture for Tash cucking chat GPT?
Click to expand...
You can't cuck anything that's been trained on billions of pages of knowledge, trillions of words, including research and studies, countless cross-references patterns in any context imaginable, access to fact-checking and unbiased content you wouldn't know where and how to look for.

ChatGPT is the King Cucker and you just knighted the machine as your cucklord overlord.
 
Tash26 said:
But again. I feel like you're going round in circles. I don't care that it's not super healthy. It's also not super unhealthy. So I'm going to keep drinking it. And I'll drink worse stuff. And it probably won't kill me
Click to expand...
Lmao what circles?
 
Tash26 said:
Like all of my responses are acknowledging that it's not a miracle drink. But you keep going back to GPT...
Click to expand...
I went to the GPT to have it generate the URL citations you complained about the lack of. That hardly "you keep going back to GPT."

My position is that it's completely bad for you and have demonstrated that with the research tool.
 
But I also said I didn't care about this sources. My biggest complaint was the GPT itself.

Again circles

We'll agree to disagree
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top