Group Banter Race to a million

Stanthropical said:
Nobody cares about personal beliefs and how you lead your life in private. But when a public mouthpiece for a certain set of beliefs not representative of the sane and ethical majority spews hurtful rhetoric, that validatse and empowers really fucked up people with an ability to carry out what the shitty mouthpiece cannot, which amounts to what Nazis and their leader cooked up.

Edits*
Click to expand...
I disagree with you and your beliefs on this. However, I do not wish ill of you. I don't want to kill you, I don't want other to kill you. Freedom of your speech and your views is a belief engrained deeply inside me. I don't have to agree, I don't have to listen, I could simply hit ignore. But I don't condone violent acts against those who disagree with each other, public or private.
 
Craig53m said:
They don't deserve to be killed for their speech. Hate speech is everywhere, including in here. Disagree, don't listen, turn the channel. I don't like some of the other side's beliefs, and some have issued what I consider to be hate speech. But I do not want to kill them, nor do I want anybody else to kill them. Sadly, I would lay down my own life to preserve their right to speak freely, even though I am incensed by some of their speech. The vast majority would not do the same for me or my speech.
Click to expand...
Killing is extreme, I agree, and sets a terrible precedent for further acts of violence. But acting like the guy was some saint who should rest in peace is gonna draw some pushback. I wonder how much you’ve actually read about the things he’s said, up to and including justifying mass shooting deaths (of children!) as acceptable sacrifices to keep the 2nd amendment

And acting like one side is the only one that advocates violent protest and retribution is extremely disingenuous. January 6th?
 
The issue is far, far, far beyond loss of life. People are not mourning life. People are mourning for a loss of a brazen mouthpiece—masqueraded as... This is pointless. Shit is clear as day. You don't even need to be autistic or hardcore ADHD to cut through fog of bullshit.
 
Craig53m said:
I disagree with you and your beliefs on this. However, I do not wish ill of you. I don't want to kill you, I don't want other to kill you. Freedom of your speech and your views is a belief engrained deeply inside me. I don't have to agree, I don't have to listen, I could simply hit ignore. But I don't condone violent acts against those who disagree with each other, public or private.
Click to expand...
I'm not citing my beliefs. I'm pointing out observable and undeniable facts. I'm yet to state my beliefs.
 
youngbustyredhead said:
Killing is extreme, I agree, and sets a terrible precedent for further acts of violence. But acting like the guy was some saint who should rest in peace is gonna draw some pushback. I wonder how much you’ve actually read about the things he’s said, up to and including justifying mass shooting deaths (of children!) as acceptable sacrifices to keep the 2nd amendment

And acting like one side is the only one that advocates violent protest and retribution is extremely disingenuous. January 6th?
Click to expand...
No question mark regarding Jan 6th. We would disagree as to provocation.
 
Stanthropical said:
The issue is far, far, far beyond loss of life. People are not mourning life. People are mourning for a loss of a brazen mouthpiece—masqueraded as... This is pointless. Shit is clear as day. You don't even need to be autistic or hardcore ADHD to cut through fog of bullshit.
Click to expand...
I consider this hate speech. It's all in the perspective.
 
Craig53m said:
Undeniable facts? Hence why we do not interact often.
Click to expand...
I haven't once sought or begged to interact you for any social reasons, so I don't know what you're talking about or why you're mentioning such a completely irrelevant metric in your social activity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top