Every single Magazine for men will, in various degrees and styles, at some point depict half nude women.
As fas as I am aware, not a single female magazine does that with men.
1) why?
2) would you like them to?
1) Because sex sells and women are sexy as all fuck and although we like the visuals too, we seem to thrive on more of a combo than simply just voyeuristic arousal on its own in order to be turned on!
We are fabulous multitaskers so I'm talking visuals occasionally but most or all of the following factors put together in a way that makes it more of an experience (no offense guys) seems to be our jam.
We also seem to value foreplay more generally and generously than men as well as using witty/sassy/sensual communication, flirting, humour, laughter, sharing fantasies, speaking with wonderfully womanly vixen voices and the dirty talk to match.
Dont get me wrong, hearing sexy mens voices can be a massive turn on for us too.
We tend to turn on our minds first and THEN our pussies follow after there's also how much we value touch, taste, scent, sound, passionate kissing, creating ambient moods and surroundings, dancing seductively, dressing up in pretty lingerie and sexy costumes with hot heels and makeup, and accesories cause we love to peacock (a term that relates to going to quite an effort with dressing up, nice clothes and hair styling and showing off all our beauty when we want to attract a male.)
On the other hand you guys are such cave men, beast blooded, testosterone filled, easily triggered, pavlovian, voyeuristic creatures and it's really obvious to guage your arousal if you know what I mean ... of course you do!! SHWIIING!
As far as I have come to understand from experience, men always seem pretty shameless about their "rising mojo" becoming known and even more shameless about being turned on and physically Ready by seeing, viewing, looking at and watching something or someone sexy that alerts their cocks and accompanies their visual arousal so obviously.
So that's my theory. Pics in mags for you men guys works and is probably just good marketing strategy, whereas I believe women need more than JUST a photo.
It could even be partly because old school, traditional, sexist standards still somehow exist pretty strongly in the typically man owned and dominated journalism world.
2) I don't buy those mags so no fucks given here but I do believe in equality for the sexes so in that case yeah, maybe they should to it for the hornbag ladies who deserve a good magazine perve just as much as the men folk do.
Ova and OUT XXX
(No I'm not cause I just thought of something I wanted to add ... ever notice how in 7Elevens and newsagents there's only ever hustler/playboy/slutty half dressed and badly tattood chics on motorbikes monthly [made that one uo lmao!] and sometimes those ones with a white privacy screen to hide the Penthouse centrefold cover girl pussy from the little people's eye levels.
Anyway ... Where were the equivalent for women?! NOWHERE!! WTAF IS THAT?
Wondering if it was more of a sexist thing OR was it just that women weren't any where near the massive, shameless, horny, easily excited bunch of perves that men are conditioned and encouraged to be from young ages?!
Hmmm!!!
(PheonixXx OUT version 2.0h)