L
LeatherPants
Guest
explain this (with mathmatical back-up of course) and the Nobel is yours! There are a few theories floating around. Im curious to others thoughts on the matter. (pun not intended)
Matter Antimatter imbalance is a big mystery and there are some thoughts given out by many people
1) may be at the time of big-bang itself "laws of physics" were unified. And thus they may or may not be equal. and making anti-matter near to negligible in compared to the mass of matter.
2) The observable universe is basically the further area of the universe from where the light has reached us. Light may be a matter of property and what if anti-matter properties are opposite of matter's and they were the first ones to chucked out on the big bang and are further away in depth of non-observable space.
3) if it is all about balance, could there be two universes, one that of matter and one parallel but made up of anti-matter. would the time be running backward in that universe?
4) The last one on my mind is the black hole. We still have to understand them. We know they can be both large and small. We know whether small or large the mass compressed in that are is super dense. So are all blackholes actually antimatter in condensed form? and would their weight balance out the visible universe's matter mass?
So all of these above actually are in reply to the question, why there is an imbalance in the observable universe.
Instead of questioning the validity, I find questioning the "Visibility" aspect of it. It needs to be condensed, beyond the visual spectrum.
1) may be at the time of big-bang itself "laws of physics" were unified. And thus they may or may not be equal. and making anti-matter near to negligible in compared to the mass of matter.
2) The observable universe is basically the further area of the universe from where the light has reached us. Light may be a matter of property and what if anti-matter properties are opposite of matter's and they were the first ones to chucked out on the big bang and are further away in depth of non-observable space.
3) if it is all about balance, could there be two universes, one that of matter and one parallel but made up of anti-matter. would the time be running backward in that universe?
4) The last one on my mind is the black hole. We still have to understand them. We know they can be both large and small. We know whether small or large the mass compressed in that are is super dense. So are all blackholes actually antimatter in condensed form? and would their weight balance out the visible universe's matter mass?
So all of these above actually are in reply to the question, why there is an imbalance in the observable universe.
Instead of questioning the validity, I find questioning the "Visibility" aspect of it. It needs to be condensed, beyond the visual spectrum.
L
LeatherPants
Guest
very interesting thoughts my friend, and i thoroughly enjoyed reading your take on it. Thank you for sharing!
Are your thoughts on something similar?
and of course most welcome, I love something that stimulates the grey cells in life. This has been a big mystery, to the level there are some people even going overboard saying, this proves Big Bang is wrong and "Supreme Designer" is the right way.
and of course most welcome, I love something that stimulates the grey cells in life. This has been a big mystery, to the level there are some people even going overboard saying, this proves Big Bang is wrong and "Supreme Designer" is the right way.
L
LeatherPants
Guest
Yes true, and big bang suggests symmetry as it relates to baryonic matter. I do have a working thought on the issue. In an attempt to resolve /incorporate the TOE i have postulated that the warping of space time by massive objects somehow affects matter (or, more specifically, how we observe it). You are right, i think, about the "visibility" of dark matter. I believe it is the crux of the issue. Perhaps the rapid cooling of the universe affected some fields (higgs, EM, ect) in a way that some matter usually interacting with photons stopped. There is a lot to think about and the corresponding maths send my mind reeling. So..im not sure....lol 
Maybe you are right, some times Physics work well when seen via Mathematician's eyes rather than Physicist's
Thing is Big Bang theory according to me, suggests nothing. (I am no scientist am just an enthusiast)
As per my understanding, it was the other way around, since we see all around matter and anti-matter getting created the same time, making us question if so much matter got created at the beginning of time then where is the antimatter part of it?
Thus I like to question about rules of Physics when all things were converging to at one spot- the moment before the BB.
Or as you also picked up, about our capability or understanding on how to "observe"
Good Luck my friend, if you get closer to Nobel Prize
, it will be SUPER COOL.
Thing is Big Bang theory according to me, suggests nothing. (I am no scientist am just an enthusiast)
As per my understanding, it was the other way around, since we see all around matter and anti-matter getting created the same time, making us question if so much matter got created at the beginning of time then where is the antimatter part of it?
Thus I like to question about rules of Physics when all things were converging to at one spot- the moment before the BB.
Or as you also picked up, about our capability or understanding on how to "observe"
Good Luck my friend, if you get closer to Nobel Prize
, it will be SUPER COOL.
L
LeatherPants
Guest
lol..im not seeking a Nobel. im just a wannabe theorist. You mentioned pre big bang and according to renowned physicist Brian Greene the pre universe consisted of matter in an inflaton field. Another thing to consider with dark matter is the non-zero value of quantum foam. Its the "void of space". I feel it has something to do with some matter not being visible. That and higgs field interactions with matter. The spooky nature of quantum mechanics and field theory leaves me wondering about it. Who knows ..lol.
Agree with all you said, but Void of Space, if there was anti-matter we would see loads of booms going along is my feeling of matter-touching-anti-matter.
This kind of bursts we only see at the heart of black hole when it spews out energy, thus my thought of black hole being anti-matter. and the same time them being super dense helping with the "mass" part of the balance.
This been fun - Cheers
This kind of bursts we only see at the heart of black hole when it spews out energy, thus my thought of black hole being anti-matter. and the same time them being super dense helping with the "mass" part of the balance.
This been fun - Cheers
L
LeatherPants
Guest
*thumbs-up*
