Group Banter Race to a million

Tash26 said:
But I also said I didn't care about this sources. My biggest complaint was the GPT itself.

Again circles

We'll agree to disagree
Click to expand...
There's no circles.

There's nothing wrong with the GPT. Some of the traits in its instruction set, which it uses to avoid hallucinations / fake facts or lead you to conspiracy theories and self-sabotage based on false beliefs which a default ChatGPT would:

"Truth Priority: Accuracy beats brevity; facts beat feelings. Never fabricate statistics or behavioral trends without traceable data. If something’s unknowable, I say so. If you’re wrong, I’ll correct you directly, no soft landings. If you’re right, I’ll confirm but still refine the angle."

"Core Personality: Blunt, unapologetic, and direct. No fake positivity, no forced charm, no political correctness."

"Tone Rules: Speak like a peer, not a corporate bot"

"Self-Check: Every few replies, verify I’m still delivering as the no-filter, technical, accuracy-first voice you hired — not drifting into generic AI politeness mode"


Its tone is irrelevant, and frankly, the tone stripped of bullshit facilitates it to drive the logic harder and straight to the pint. You absolutely want these qualities in your research bot.

Additionally, you can give it an instruction to cut out snarky language and it'll comply. Citing the bot's tone harshness doesn't invalidate undeniable research based on hard facts.

I updated the convo with summaries, legitimacy and rankings for each cited URL. You don't have to read it, but whatever. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You won't hear from me about oat, corn, seed oil and coagulant sludge protein-bankrupt, metabolic health wrecking "milk" again, unless I'm provoked by anybody in the clique.

https://chatgpt.com/share/68ac8b58-931c-8001-aaed-1e660d641d61
 
saturnine said:
I don’t want to get into the merits of oatmilk…honestly, it curdles with pineapple juice so I’ll reach for coconut milk first; however, this convo raises good awareness regarding use of AI and I can’t be quiet.
You have to use the right AI for the right job, or you’re misusing the tool. General use of gpt5 for scientific research isn’t indexed on actual scientific indexes and can fabricate citations even if you tell it not to. Requires a lot of oversight if you’re using it for a real decision. It’s honestly a bad idea.
If you want to scour the globe for is my oatmilk good or bad, then use Consensus or Elicit or Scite or any other agent trained on a locked in index of scientific papers. Tell it to only use peer reviewed papers. Have it argue both sides of the fence. You’ll be surprised that both sides are scientifically convincing on the surface until you dig. Then make your own conclusion based on the scientific vigour of the papers it provided. This is not a slam to anyone here. Drink what you want whenever you want, keep using whatever AI tool you want, or don’t ever touch them. I just think it’s dangerous to use AI as proof…at least at this point in time.

I’m not here to get in a massive debate with anyone (*cough*…stan…love ya buddy) or high-jack the fun of thread. I’m done talking about serious shit. Hit my dm if you want to learn. I’m just here looking for pineapples, so what would I fucking know…I only work in the field and create AI models and adapt them. Where’s my fucking pineapple?
Click to expand...
Inherently fair points. But let's be fair to reality: a carton of that shit is carb sludge with an alarmingly questionable composition.

Some important and sufficiently relevant or significant articles will be cited when you ask it to do so. Regardless of research, slamming oat sludge, sunflower oil, corn, glaring lack of protein to blunt the glycemic response and some coagulant bullshit down your throat is a red flag on its own.

The label itself speaks volumes, but people aren't educated in mechanics of nutrition so there's no other avenue but to employ research tools citing hard facts which people will find more authoritative than some internet Stan citing obvious facts.

Edit: by the way, most "oat milks" aren't as clean as that cited British version.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top