I would love to see writers with opposing positions attempt to paraphrase each other's position as accurately and empathetically as possible. Without refutation or barbs. I guess it's the possible part that makes it unlikely. Mutually respectful dialogue is so important. And like a rare gem, so hard to come by. I appreciate the rational elements of discussion here - on various sides - but one has to sift through a lot of sticks and stones. A Palestinian and a Jew walk into a bar A Right-to-Lifer and a Right-to-Chooser walk into a bar A Right and a Left walk into a bar Den vot? "When they go low, we go high." Those were the days
That would be good if he was succeeding but he isn't. It seems now he is going to declare a National Emergency and try to build it that way. But there will certainly be lawsuits to hold it up in court for years. And even if he was successful it wouldn't be what he promised. That Mexico would build it. And he will have lost to Pelosi and the Democrates who swore they wouldn't fund a wall.
He replied to a dead thread that no one gave any fucks about anymore. But honestly, im over this whole fourm tbh. Theres no point in arguing with anyone on here anymore. Auto just posts MAGA memes, Devon starts off with good points then goes to the extreme and gets himself banned. All day every day, same shit. Blah blah blah.
