Antimatter and dark matter

msub_Ind said:
With current technology, Yes, but we will invent something soon, like for eg: laser to be used for such high energy & luminosity.. let's see.
If more & more money involved, then people start to question their leaders about funding such mega projects at some point of time...
Click to expand...

What if Stephen Hawking was a reaal Slim Shady but he just couldn't get up :P
 
Umm.. so I just now stumbled into these forums because the chat server is down. LOVE this convo so much! I had no idea any of this was even here lol.

Did you know, that it's postulated that dark matter may have only originated mere seconds before the proposed big bang..
 
I think it's true, we really start seeing the presence of Dark matter after the Inflation period, this is the reason that the Universe is undergoing accelerated expansion..
 
msub_Ind said:
True, they can be extremely dense as they are all pull in by its gravity forming quarks, antiquarks, gluons etc etc.
Click to expand...
The latest consideration is that we simply have gotten the age of the universe wrong, by around 10 billion years. Factoring this into account means that there is no need for wimps, halos or amassed primordial black holes, it is just what we would expect it to be.
 
Vanessa_Agogo said:
The latest consideration is that we simply have gotten the age of the universe wrong, by around 10 billion years. Factoring this into account means that there is no need for wimps, halos or amassed primordial black holes, it is just what we would expect it to be.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter the age of Universe is wrong by 10 billion years, eventually truth will come out from various puzzles. For eg: proton decay, proton is so stable causing our existence in the Universe and the half life of it is more than the age of the Universe. Soon or later we can get a handle of these,including the age of Universe, understanding black holes and so on.
 
msub_Ind said:
It doesn't matter the age of Universe is wrong by 10 billion years, eventually truth will come out from various puzzles. For eg: proton decay, proton is so stable causing our existence in the Universe and the half life of it is more than the age of the Universe. Soon or later we can get a handle of these,including the age of Universe, understanding black holes and so on.
Click to expand...
To dismiss the age of the universe as unimportant is to dismiss a major factor governing divergence and weakening of the forces of nature ie. gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces. This divergence since the Big Bang (and continues to diverge) is at the heart of all changes.
I would refer you to the research of Rajendra Gupta of the University of Ottawa published in The Astrophysical Journal.
 
Last edited:
Vanessa_Agogo said:
To dismiss the age of the universe as unimportant is to dismiss a major factor governing divergence of the forces of nature ie. gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces. This divergence since the Big Bang (and continues to diverge) is at the heart of all changes.
I would refer you to the research of Rajendra Gupta of the University of Ottawa published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Click to expand...

I didn't say it's unimportant, it is important, but there is lot of uncertainty in measuring the age of the Universe. Of course, by theory, the Grand Unification happens at extreme high energies. This still doesn't include Gravity, though electroweak physics is well established, hopefully the age of Universe will give us light to the Grand Unification. We are getting there with various theoretical predictions and observations.
 
msub_Ind said:
I think it's true, we really start seeing the presence of Dark matter after the Inflation period, this is the reason that the Universe is undergoing accelerated expansion..
Click to expand...
Well actually it could be that dark matter evolves in its own quantuum fields, with a bunch of dufferent particules and WIMPS, that would have been generated by another bigbang jyst before ours, OR it may be just a misconception of our theory of relativity and so, gravity itself, and in this case dark matter doesnt exist
 
SaturnV said:
Well actually it could be that dark matter evolves in its own quantuum fields, with a bunch of dufferent particules and WIMPS, that would have been generated by another bigbang jyst before ours, OR it may be just a misconception of our theory of relativity and so, gravity itself, and in this case dark matter doesnt exist
Click to expand...

At least we know gravity is capable of interacting with dark matter, so it definitely has some connection to our Universe. Dark matter definitely exists as that corresponds to approx 24% of our Universe. Also, without experimental evidence, one can formulate anything.. so we need to wait to get more info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top