It's the full conversion, entire matter can be converted into radiation when it interact/collide with equal amount of antimatter.. this is what is going on in the collider experiments.
Antimatter and dark matter
- Thread starter Captaincockblock
- Start date
It's the full conversion, entire matter can be converted into radiation when it interact/collide with equal amount of antimatter.. this is what is going on in the collider experiments.
actualy antimater is side product of colisions but its very smal amoun for 1g we would need couple of milions years. and antimatter is also #made near event horazion when exotic particles pop into existence and disapere but sometimes some of them escapes thats hwakins radiation
but abtimatter i+is basicle like normal matter ecsept charge is swiched but yes esentialy mass = energie... fun fact if speed of light would be infinent there would not be any mass 
actualy antimater is side product of colisions but its very smal amoun for 1g we would need couple of milions years. and antimatter is also #made near event horazion when exotic particles pop into existence and disapere but sometimes some of them escapes thats hwakins radiation
Partially true. Antimatter is constantly coming to Earth surface via cosmic rays or even from the Sun by nuclear fusion. Then we produce them in collisions. It's the same pair production principle happening in Hawking Radiation as one half of produced matter sucked into Black hole and the other comes out as Hawking Radiation. Thus the conclusion is it's not so difficult to produce 1g of antimatter in the Universe
Antimatter is similar to matter with charge switched - this is 100% true, but they are unstable in the present matter dominated Universe, right after bigbang, there were equal amount of matter and antimatter, then inflation, cosmological CP violation etc happened to reach the present level.
Partially true. Antimatter is constantly coming to Earth surface via cosmic rays or even from the Sun by nuclear fusion. Then we produce them in collisions. It's the same pair production principle happening in Hawking Radiation as one half of produced matter sucked into Black hole and the other comes out as Hawking Radiation. Thus the conclusion is it's not so difficult to produce 1g of antimatter in the Universe
Antimatter is similar to matter with charge switched - this is 100% true, but they are unstable in the present matter dominated Universe, right after bigbang, there were equal amount of matter and antimatter, then inflation, cosmological CP violation etc happened to reach the present level.
Not in universe i was talking about us on earth in a coliders
But even if there were such an encounter, these experiments produce such tiny amounts it would take 10 trillion years to make just .25 grams of antimatter, the amount needed for a theoretical "antimatter bomb."
From https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/cern-antimatter-factory-creates-most-explosive-material-photos-2023-4?amp
CERN could be mentioning about the antimatter that we actually detect in the detector whose efficiency is quite low. Imagine equal amount of proton and antiproton produced in 13 TeV energy, and antiproton mass is almost equal to the mass of Hydrogen atom, one gram of H contains 6 x 10^23 such atoms, and there are millions of such proton-antiprotons were produced in per second, so it's not difficult to produce 1g of antimatter from collider experiments.
This article was specific for that antimatter factory where they produce it intentonaly for research but offcourse in all coliders it happening this.. I find double slit delay choice quantoum eraser experiment wich is continious of double slit experiment and it sugeste tha electron knows the future
Yeah that is one of the theory and it would explain why it curves light, is invisible, weights a lot and makes patches.
Another explaination i saw resides in the theory that dictactes that there actually has been 2 bigbangs. A first dark one, that instantly generated another bigbang, our's. And the first bigbang would have grnerated a whole field intricated in ours's, with all its particules and interractions. So, dark matter and dark energy. It would have led over time to a second whole different physic of the universe, with a whole table of chemical elements AND laws that we cant reach neither understand yet. In this theory there would be different types of dark matter particukes, forming maybe dark bozons, dark axions, maybe dark atoms, all with different size, mass, proprieties and interactions. As they would be in different quantuum fields than the ones in wich barionic matter is produced, that would explain why dont understand it yet.
about bozons didnt they just discovered that maybe is not the one responcible for mass
Actually matters is organized in differdnt types of particles. Bozons are just a class of particle. They are responsible for the interactions between other classes of particules if i dont say shit. And, the Highs Bozon, is responsible for giving its mass to every other particule.
But there are other classes of particuleslile Axions, Fermions...
I just read that somewhere ill try find the article
Exactly, it's very expensive to accelerate antiparticles in collider experiments for collisions..
and thanks for the video, informative.. I don't know much about it, probably it could be due to the Quantum entanglement of photons originated at the same time. Worth to read E(Einstein)P(Podolsky)R(Rosen) Paradox to know more about it.
Could be, that's why it is important to detect such non-Standard Model particles to know more about the origin of the Universe.
You meant higgs Boson, this is the particle that gives mass to all the known particle in the Universe at the moment. If a particle is massless (like photon) it means it has 0 interaction with higgs field, whereas the heavy particle such as top quark (~175 GeV mass) interact pretty strongly to it. What we discovered in 2012 is indeed the one that gives mass to all the known particles in the Universe, which corresponds to only 4% of our understanding of the Universe. If we find more such particles, then they definitely give insight to Dark Matter particles like Axions or Dark energy, thus broaden our knowledge of the Universe and big bang.
N
NotSoNewGuy
Guest
The only thing i can add is that i made a story a long time ago where dark matter was used to biologically augment and create super soldiers. At the time i simply chose dark matter because it sounded cool.
Then later i did a few dips of research and.....yeaaaaah that's not how dark matter works at all.
Then later i did a few dips of research and.....yeaaaaah that's not how dark matter works at all.
but if we dont make bigger accselaretors we cant cuz we need more energie to see what was going on erlier before particle were created after univerz cooled enough to made that posible... they actualy suggeste accselaretor around the moon
noooo dark metter is becauze we dont know much about it, else ist total BS. sry
Probably humans will find a new way than accelerators to raise the energy than using the "old fashioned" circular accelerators... cost matters... Next gen accelerators will appear shortly in the form of Future Circular Collider etc.. so watch out for more info
Probably humans will find a new way than accelerators to raise the energy than using the "old fashioned" circular accelerators... cost matters... Next gen accelerators will appear shortly in the form of Future Circular Collider etc.. so watch out for more info
maybe nut for now thats the only way
With current technology, Yes, but we will invent something soon, like for eg: laser to be used for such high energy & luminosity.. let's see.
If more & more money involved, then people start to question their leaders about funding such mega projects at some point of time...
Trending content
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thread 'Discuss positive implications and share positive Artificial Intelligence news'- Stanthropical
Replies: 3