I understand what you're saying. But
I didn't say that. I said:
There's a clear anti-conservative bias, therefore there's a market for free speech platforms - like Minds or Gab [I don't use any of them, so I can't comment on how well they operate]. Jack Dorsey on JRE even said that conservatives are afraid to even speak their opinions. And these are people working from the inside. Some woman leaked how Facebook was throttling conservative live streams through complicated algorithms. She was eventually caught and fired. It's no secret that these Silicon Valley techies are mostly liberal. SJW radiation and too busy coding to know anything else. Beta males. It only makes sense. I think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook are monopolies, but I'm not interested in the Government stopping itself from becoming the technocracy it's destined to become. If the hydra is to be beheaded - it won't be by its own hands.
View attachment 97259
There's an argument to be made that these social media platforms ought to have free speech, as it's public utility - like telephones. But the media is so new that there's no legislation on this. It'll most likely happen, like it did with TV and the radio. But I'm not saying and I have never said they ought to do this. I mostly don't care and expect it.